\the_nation

0
2017.11.18

Former Secretary Clinton and Uranium One

Fox vs Fox


Photo of Fox News Anchor Shepard Smith. Image credit: Fox News
Shepard Smith of Shepard Smith Reporting

 

I've a friend whom I consider rather a hardcore conservative. I reached out to him recently about a week ago when news broke about the DRUDGE REPORT — his favorite webzine — being linked to propaganda from Russia. 1  His reply: "Sessions better be planning a major Hillary investigation ... uranium one deal is potentially steeped in corruption." When I asked what purpose further investigation of Ms. Clinton would actually serve, he suggested that the "Best approach is to watch Fox News. You won't learn what is happening in Congress investigations on other news channels."


Shepard Smith Reporting

So this morning when I read an article examining a recent report by Fox News' Shepard Smith regarding this whole Uranium One mess, I had to share it with him. The article included the Fox News footage, provided below:

I'd rather not decorate Mr. Smith's reporting with inputs from other pundits, or with my thoughts just yet. I'd like to simply point out what Mr. Smith addressed here:

  • How Uranium One came to be under Russian control
  • The accusation and its source
  • Presidential Candidate Trump's allegation, dated June 2016
  • CFIUS, and the federal government process for evaluating foreign investment in the United States
  • The actual NRC recommendation and stiplulation
  • Donations to the Clinton Foundation — source and timing.
It sure seems to me that Mr. Smith ran this to ground.


Backlash and Fox's Identity

As word of the Smith segment spread to other news outlets (CNN 2  and The Washington Post 3 are a couple of examples), they began to report just as much about the backlash from Fox News viewers as Mr. Smith's piece.

A separate Washington Post "analysis" article discussed the "different realities" in which Fox' Hannity and Smith live. I found the quote of a Fox News spokesperson particularly telling, describing Hannity as "an outstaning opinion commentator" and Smith as "an outstanding journalist." 4. Let that sink in. Hannity and Carlson and their ilk may be Fox's bread and butter, but it's not news — it's commentary.


Final Note

I suppose we've yet to really discern the impact of Mr. Smith's report — particularly whether we'll see the Trump Administration, Fox News commentators, and other conservatives back away from the Uranium One story.



personal statement

Humor posts aside, I only seek to understand the events I describe in these posts, and to form an opinion after considering the material I've gathered. I believe we need leaders in Washington to act in the best interest of the United States as a citizen nation of the world, and who represent the interests of the people they serve above the interests of party affiliation.