\the_nation

0
2017.01.25

US Immigration and National Security: Making Good on Campaign Promises, For Better or Worse

Doing What He Said He'd Do


Close-up of Mr. Trump's presidential stare (from his official White House photo)

 

Regardless of how you feel about his position on these matters, President Trump is showing that he is different than the usual Washington crowd: He's doing exactly what he said he'd do. And I very strongly respect that, Mr. President.

I awoke this morning to news that executive orders are being drafted to tighten our borders by building that wall between the US and Mexico and restricting the flow of immigrants into the country.

I'm uncomfortable with this legislation. (I can't really call it legislation, can I? Perhaps better said, I'm uncomfortable with this... direction.) According to the Pew Research Center, illegal immigrants are estimated to comprise approximately 3.5% of the population. In September, 2016, The Center for American Progress estimated that undocumented workers account for 2.6% of our GDP. The report includes an interactive map which lets you see percentages of GSP by industry for each state. Look at these numbers of the top five states with the highest dependence on undocumented labor:

STATES WITH HIGHEST DEPENDENCE ON ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT LABOR
(Source: Center for American Progress)

STATE Agriculture, Forestry,
Fishing, Hunting
Construction Leisure and
Hospitality
ESTIMATED TOTAL
LOSS IN GSP
NJ 14% 10% 13% 5%
CA 21% 12% 14% 5%
NV NA 14% 9% 4%
TX 10% 13% 12% 4%
WA 23% 4% 9% 3%


The The Penn Wharton Budget Model also characterizes the economic effect of immigration on the economy as "net positive". And, on the subject of GDP, I submit that those immigrants are largely doing work that Americans frankly don't want to do. Pew estimates that illegal immigrants hold 8 million jobs in this country. I opine that some significant percentage of those jobs are not considered by most Americans to be desirable jobs. Sure, one could always argue that those "undesirable" jobs can be filled by penal labor/WPA/volunteers or whatever, but the point I'm making is simply (*cue Styx's Mister Roboto here*) that the illegal immigrant workforce is likely performing a service to US society beyond economic contribution.

The larger issue here I think is closing our borders in the interest of security. That's... a tough one. On the one hand, you're talking about immigration, period — no differentiation between legal and illegal here. Closing our borders to predominantly Muslim countries means the restriction of legal access. Perhaps part of the problem is our basic inability to differentiate between Muslims and "radicalized" Muslims. Gathering intelligence on every person from all of the countries listed in the Executive Order seems a Hurculean effort at best; it's clear the Trump Administration isn't interested in making that kind of investment, and I doubt that any government would, if they felt they had a choice.

The counterpoint: the United States of America is a nation of immigrants, who blazed their own trail and became the greatest nation on earth. Immigration is part of our national identity — set in stone on Lady Liberty (okay, technically, set in brass), The New Colossus:

"Keep, ancient lands, your storied pomp!" cries she
With silent lips. "Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door!"
The State of Liberty, with her torch held high, has long stood as a beacon of hope for all who reach our shores. Yes, there is a security interest. Yes, there is a threat. But closing our borders and building walls is not who we are.



personal statement

Humor posts aside, I only seek to understand the events I describe in these posts, and to form an opinion after considering the material I've gathered. I believe we need leaders in Washington to act in the best interest of the United States as a citizen nation of the world, and who represent the interests of the people they serve above the interests of party affiliation.